Improvement in Work Productivity After Group Voice Therapy in Professional Voice Users.

OBJECTIVE: A disordered voice may significantly impair the ability of workers to perform optimally on the job, especially those classified as professional voice users (PVU). Voice therapy is a common treatment option for voice disorders, but there are few studies demonstrating its effect on work productivity. The objective of this study was to evaluate the change in work productivity in PVU after group voice therapy. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study SETTING: Academic Voice Center METHODS: PVUs whose primary treatment for their voice disorder was voice therapy were recruited. Participants completed a 7-week group voice therapy course from January 2018 to December 2020. Participants completed the validated Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire (WPAI) which measured presenteeism (on the job work productivity impairment) and absenteeism (time missed from work), general self-efficacy scale (GSES), and Voice handicap index -10 (VHI-10) before and after group voice therapy. Changes in scores before and after therapy were compared using a Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test. RESULTS: Twenty-seven PVU were recruited; 25 had complete data (100% female, mean age 45.4 years, 68% teachers). Presenteeism (SD) decreased from 72.0% (23.3) to 36.8% (24.8), which represented a significant improvement of 35.2% (27.8) [95% CI 21.7-38.7; P < 0.001]. Activity impairment decreased from 48.4% (32.0) to 25.6% (23.8), which represented a significant improvement of 22.8% (26.5) [95% CI 20.7-37.0; P < 0.00]. There was no change in absenteeism (P = 0.27). Patients had high mean GSES of 34.4 (3.7) and abnormal mean VHI-10 of 18.2 (7.2). Changes in VHI-10 and GSES were not significant. CONCLUSION: PVU had an improvement in work productivity that was largely represented by decreased presenteeism after completing group voice therapy.

Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Spasmodic Dysphonia: A Phase I Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Crossover Trial.

BACKGROUND: Adductor spasmodic dysphonia (SD) is a dystonia of the vocal folds causing difficulty with speech. The current standard of care is repeated botulinum toxin injections to weaken the adductor muscles. We sought to ameliorate the underlying neurological cause of SD with a novel therapy-deep brain stimulation (DBS). OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety of DBS in SD through phase I trial, and to quantify the magnitude of any benefit. METHODS: Six patients had left ventral intermediate nucleus (Vim) thalamic DBS and were randomized to 3 mo blinded-DBS "on" or "off" followed by a crossover. Primary outcomes were quality of life and quality of voice during the blinded phase. Patients continued with open-DBS "on." Secondary outcomes were comparisons of pre- and 1-yr cognitive, mood, and quality of life. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02558634). RESULTS: There were no complications. Every patient reported an improvement in quality of life (P = .07) and had an improvement in quality of their voice (P = .06) when their blinded DBS was "on" versus "off." The trend did not reach statistical significance with the small sample size. Secondary outcomes showed no difference in cognition, an improvement in mood, and quality of life at 1 yr. CONCLUSION: This phase I randomized controlled trial confirmed that DBS can be performed safely in patients with SD. Blinded DBS produced a strong trend toward improved quality of life and objective quality of voice despite the small sample size. The cerebellar circuit, not the pallidal circuit, appears to be crucial for motor control of the vocal folds.

Prospective cohort study of voice outcomes following secondary tracheoesophageal puncture in gastric pull-up reconstruction after total laryngopharyngoesophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Gastric pull-up is a reconstructive option for circumferential defects after resection of advanced laryngopharyngeal malignancy. Voice loss is expected and vocal rehabilitation remains a challenge. Our study objectives were to investigate the feasibility of secondary tracheoesophageal puncture following gastric pull-up and to analyze voice outcomes. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of patients with advanced laryngopharyngeal malignancies who underwent gastric pull-up and secondary tracheoesophageal puncture between 1988 and 2017 at a tertiary-care academic institution. Objective acoustic measures included fundamental frequency and vocal intensity. Perceptual analysis was performed using voice recordings ("Rainbow Passage") randomly presented in a blinded fashion to four clinicians using the validated GRBAS scale. Speech intelligibility was assessed in a blinded fashion using a validated 7-point scale. Additionally, the Voice Handicap Index-10 was administered as a validated patient self-reporting tool. RESULTS: Ten patients (7 male, 3 female) were included, all of whom preferentially used tracheoesophageal puncture for communication. These patients had abnormal median fundamental frequency of 250 (interquartile range (IQR) 214-265) Hz and a limited median vocal intensity of 65.8 (IQR 64.1-68.3) dB. Perceptual analysis (GRBAS) revealed a median 'moderate' degree of impairment [grade 2 (IQR 2-3), roughness 2 (IQR 2-3), breathiness 3 (IQR 2-3), asthenia 2 (IQR 1-2), strain 2 (IQR 1-2)] as did median intelligibility scores [median 5 (IQR 4-7)]. Most patients self-reported an abnormal voice handicap-10 [median 26.5 (IQR 22.8-35.0)]. CONCLUSION: Secondary tracheoesophageal puncture is a safe and feasible option for voice rehabilitation after gastric pull-up. Although analyses demonstrated moderate subjective and objective impairment, tracheoesophageal puncture provided patients with a self-reported means of functional verbal communication and was their preferred method of communication.

Unilateral Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Voice Tremor.

BACKGROUND: Voice tremor (VT) is the involuntary and rhythmical phonatory instability of the voice. Recent findings suggest that unilateral deep brain stimulation of the ventral intermediate nucleus (Vim-DBS) can sometimes be effective for VT. In this exploratory analysis, we investigated the effect of Vim-DBS on VT and tested the hypothesis that unilateral thalamic stimulation is effective for patients with VT. METHODS: Seven patients with VT and previously implanted bilateral Vim-DBS were enrolled in the study. Each patient was randomized and recorded performing sustained phonation during the following conditions: left thalamic stimulation, right thalamic stimulation, bilateral thalamic stimulation (Bil-ON), and no stimulation (Bil-OFF). Perceptual VT ratings and an acoustic analysis to find the rate of variation of the fundamental frequency measured by the standard deviation of the pitch (f0SD) were performed in a blinded manner. For the purposes of this study, a "dominant" side was defined as one with more than twice as much reduction in VT following Vim-DBS compared to the contralateral side. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to compare the effect of the dominant side stimulation in the reduction of VT scores and f0SD. The volume of activated tissue (VAT) of the dominant stimulation side was modelled against the degree of improvement in VT to correlate the significant stimulation cluster with thalamic anatomy. Finally, tractography analysis was performed to analyze the connectivity of the significant stimulation cluster. RESULTS: Unilateral stimulation was beneficial in all 7 patients. Five patients clearly had a "dominant" side with either benefit only seen following stimulation of one side or more than twice as much benefit from one side compared to the other. Two patients had similar benefit with unilateral stimulation from either side. The Wilcoxon paired test showed significant differences between unilateral dominant and unilateral nondominant stimulation for VT scores (p = 0.04), between unilateral dominant and Bil-OFF (p = 0.04), and between Bil-ON and unilateral nondominant stimulation (p = 0.04). No significant differences were found between Bil-ON and unilateral dominant condition (p = 0.27), or between Bil-OFF and unilateral nondominant (p = 0.23). The dominant VAT showed that the significant voxels associated with the best VT control were located in the most ventral and medial part of the Vim nucleus and the ventralis caudalis anterior internus nucleus. The connectivity analysis showed significant connectivity with the cortical areas of the speech circuit. CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral dominant-side thalamic stimulation and bilateral thalamic stimulation were equally effective in reducing VT. Nondominant unilateral stimulation alone did not significantly improve VT.

The effect of unilateral thalamic deep brain stimulation on the vocal dysfunction in a patient with spasmodic dysphonia: interrogating cerebellar and pallidal neural circuits.

Spasmodic dysphonia (SD) is a neurological disorder of the voice where a patient's ability to speak is compromised due to involuntary contractions of the intrinsic laryngeal muscles. Since the 1980s, SD has been treated with botulinum toxin A (BTX) injections into the throat. This therapy is limited by the delayed-onset of benefits, wearing-off effects, and repeated injections required every 3 months. In a patient with essential tremor (ET) and coincident SD, the authors set out to quantify the effects of thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) on vocal function while investigating the underlying motor thalamic circuitry. A 79-year-old right-handed woman with ET and coincident adductor SD was referred to our neurosurgical team. While primarily treating her limb tremor, the authors studied the effects of unilateral, thalamic DBS on vocal function using the Unified Spasmodic Dysphonia Rating Scale (USDRS) and voice-related quality of life (VRQOL). Since dystonia is increasingly being considered a multinodal network disorder, an anterior trajectory into the left thalamus was deliberately chosen such that the proximal contacts of the electrode were in the ventral oralis anterior (Voa) nucleus (pallidal outflow) and the distal contacts were in the ventral intermediate (Vim) nucleus (cerebellar outflow). In addition to assessing on/off unilateral thalamic Vim stimulation on voice, the authors experimentally assessed low-voltage unilateral Vim, Voa, or multitarget stimulation in a prospective, randomized, doubled-blinded manner. The evaluators were experienced at rating SD and were familiar with the vocal tremor of ET. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to study the pre- and posttreatment effect of DBS on voice. Unilateral left thalamic Vim stimulation (DBS on) significantly improved SD vocal dysfunction compared with no stimulation (DBS off), as measured by the USDRS (p < 0.01) and VRQOL (p < 0.01). In the experimental interrogation, both low-voltage Vim (p < 0.01) and multitarget Vim + Voa (p < 0.01) stimulation were significantly superior to low-voltage Voa stimulation. For the first time, the effects of high-frequency stimulation of different neural circuits in SD have been quantified. Unexpectedly, focused Voa (pallidal outflow) stimulation was inferior to Vim (cerebellar outflow) stimulation despite the classification of SD as a dystonia. While only a single case, scattered reports exist on the positive effects of thalamic DBS on dysphonia. A Phase 1 pilot trial (DEBUSSY; clinical trial no. NCT02558634, clinicaltrials.gov) is underway at the authors' center to evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of DBS in SD. The authors hope that this current report stimulates neurosurgeons to investigate this new indication for DBS.

Injection laryngoplasty with hyaluronic acid for unilateral vocal cord paralysis. Randomized controlled trial comparing two different particle sizes.

The objective was to determine if particle size affects durability of medialization in patients undergoing injection laryngoplasty (IL) with hyaluronic acid (HA) for unilateral vocal cord paralysis (UVCP). We hypothesized that large particle-size HA (LPHA) persists longer after injection to produce a more durable vocal result. The study design used was a prospective randomized controlled single-blind trial. Patients underwent IL with Restylane (small particle-size HA, SPHA) or Perlane (LPHA) (Q-Med AB, Uppsala, Sweden). Injections were performed transcutaneously in the outpatient clinic. The Voice Handicap Index (VHI) at 6 months postinjection was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes included videostroboscopic findings, and objective acoustic and aerodynamic measures. Seventeen patients (eight SPHA, nine LPHA) were available for follow-up at 6 months. Normalized VHI scores at 6 months after IL were significantly lower in the LPHA group compared to the SPHA group when not adjusted for age and sex (P=0.027). After adjustment, the difference was not significant (P=0.053) but the LPHA group trended toward lower normalized VHI scores. The findings support the hypothesis that the larger particle-size of LPHA makes this material more durable than SPHA for IL. This material may be considered for temporary medialization in patients with UVCP in whom medium-term improvement of at least 6 months is desirable. The transcutaneous route can be used safely in the office setting in non-anticoagulated patients.

Selective denervation: reinnervation for the control of adductor spasmodic dysphonia.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a new surgical procedure for adductor spasmodic dysphonia (AddSD). This surgery involves the bilateral selective division of the adductor branches of the recurrent laryngeal nerves with immediate reinnervation of the distal nerve trunks with branches of the ansa cervicalis (selective denervation-reinnervation). METHODS: Our first six patients to undergo this procedure were enrolled in the study. All patients suffered from AddSD and had previously received botulinum toxin A (Botox, Allergen, Markham, ON) therapy. Patients were recorded preoperatively and all underwent the same surgical procedure performed by the same lead surgeon. All patients were surveyed postoperatively and then re-recorded. Expert and untrained judges undertook perceptual evaluation of voice quality. Voice samples were also objectively evaluated for aphonic voice breaks. RESULTS: No major surgical complications were noted. Patient satisfaction was excellent, and five of the six patients no longer require botulinum toxin therapy. In five of the six patients, the majority of untrained and expert listeners perceived the postoperative voice to be superior. Objectively, the rate of aphonic voice breaks was also reduced in five of the six patients.